
← Use Case
USE CASE · AI DECISIONING
Approvals, classifications, evaluations, improvement cycles. ARI orchestrates processes where AI decides when it can, and asks the human when it must.
THE PROBLEM
AI can handle a large percentage of repetitive decisions: classification, scoring, standard approvals. But there are edge cases, exceptions, high-impact decisions that require human supervision.
Agent-centric frameworks tend to delegate the judgment of when to involve the human to the LLM. This introduces a risk: the agent might fail exactly in the most critical situations. With ARI, the decision logic is explicit and designed by the team.
With ARI: the workflow defines the rules, AI applies, the system records, the human intervenes only when necessary.
01
Risk of unsupervised AI
An autonomous LLM agent might decide not to involve the human exactly when it would be necessary. The threshold is opaque. ARI thresholds are explicit.
02
Regulation and audit trail
In regulated contexts (banks, insurance, gov), every decision must be justified and traced. ARI produces complete logs: who decided, when, why.
03
Progressive improvement
Every case where a human corrects the AI is a valuable signal. ARI's Research Tree tracks these feedbacks to refine rules over time and reduce Human In The Loop cases.
HOW IT WORKS
Case Reception
The workflow receives the input: a file to evaluate, a document to classify, a request to approve or content to moderate.
Decision Maker Analysis
The Decision Maker node analyzes the case and makes a decision: documenting the logical path and the information considered.
Conditional Routing
If confidence exceeds the threshold, the workflow proceeds. If below, or if the logic requires it, the system activates the Human In The Loop node.
Human In The Loop: Human Review
The Human In The Loop node sends the review request to the operator. The operator sees the case, the proposed decision and the reasoning to decide.
Feedback Loop
Human overrides are tracked in the Research Tree. Over time, this dataset allows refining decision rules and reducing Human In The Loop cases.
BUILDING BLOCKS USED
01
Decision Maker
Analysis, evaluation and decision with complete traceability of reasoning and explicit confidence scoring.
02
Human In The Loop: Human-In-The-Loop
Selective human supervision and approval management with full contextual information for the operator.
03
RAG / Knowledge Manager
Retrieval of policies and decision rules from document bases. The Decision Maker follows company rules, it doesn't invent them.
04
Research Tree
Tracking of experiments and feedback for continuous improvement. Human In The Loop cases become training data for future refinement.
EXPECTED RESULTS
80-90%
Auto-resolved cases
Standard cases handled without human intervention.
−60%
Processing time
Reduction in average time per case compared to manual flows.
100%
Audit trail
Every decision is traced: who, when, why, AI or human.
APPLICATION SECTORS
SETTORE 01
Insurance
Automatic underwriting with edge case supervision. Claims scoring and routing to the right human liquidator.
SETTORE 02
Banking and Fintech
Credit scoring, loan approvals and KYC. The Decision Maker applies policies and Human In The Loop covers borderline cases.
SETTORE 03
Legal and Compliance
Classification of legal documents, contract compliance verification and triage with traceable reasoning.
SETTORE 04
HR and Public Admin
Initial screening of candidates and classification of support tickets. Automatic investigation with mandatory legal supervision.
Show us your concrete case. In 30 minutes we will understand together if and how ARI can bring it to production reliably.

Get in touch
Cookies and tracking
We use technical cookies and — with your consent — analytics and marketing cookies to measure traffic and improve your experience. You can accept, refuse or change your choice at any time.
More info in the Cookies Policy →